Driving of data protection

Among piles of working data, there is necessity to select and identify the real promoter to encrypt some sort of data is actually most important. Promoter could increase and enhance the need toward some data encryption more than regular one. There are many contributed factors which carry a direct influence over data encryption and how it should be. In order to be a bit clearer to explain what I mean here; any sort of data needs core factor or may be group of factors determine and say clearly that there is a urgent need toward encryption process. Without, not need to do and actually considered waste of effort on data never formed any kind of risk if they are publicly known. But the question here what are these factors determine that data need to be encrypted and who own the final decision regarding starting point of encryption. Second part of question is actually easier for now; the authorized person who owns the decision regarding which and how certain amount of data should be encrypted according to the significant importance of them.  Moreover; all of these negotiations far way from data sharing protocols and associated acts. I do not need here to remind you that keeping the data wanted to be encrypted in tunnel is the first aids of encryption process; simply no one going to encrypt public or known data otherwise, that would be against any logic. Some authorized person from governments and others from military and might be in some projects from consultation agency depending on their data modelling and analysis but all under tunnels of security. 

Other part of question takes more time and explanation regarding the contributions and factors that pushing some sort of data to be encrypted according to their nature and facilities and even the team capabilities who are working over. Due care is the first one of the contributed factors regarding will of data encryption; firms and companies are responsible to protect their clients and regular customers data and personal information. To apply Due care as a legal concept of protection hold the dealing standards of encryption. These standards differ according to nature of data and nature of involved business carries this data. When the core standards of Due care meet the needing point of data encryption by clear facts and signs. The decision of data encryption must be taken and that regime of widely use in military and national security tasks.

Reputational Risk is the second determinant factor to deal with encryption prospects and also used to determine liability and negligence. Data reputation is similar to human reputation exactly; when you see military budgets or weapon annual purchases reports that for sure known among public by high confidential sort of data even if they are not  in core work procedures of military plans, but this fixed facts for decades among society members.

Regulatory risk is the third factor of determination regarding the final encryption process of any data modelling. Explanation of the factor is merely depending on surrounding risks than the future considerations because the innovation degree of hacking certain data fragments in future not measurable yet. But when data attacking risks are higher than keeping them without encryption is become necessary and obligatory need to do.  There are other factors and categories involved in process of assessments and decision making procedures but these factors are the main and widely used among data engineers and architectures. The need to reach proper and fair decision about data promoters is actually important not only for data but also to avoid waste of society resources and taxes money with nothing in return. Full health J