Different sorts of innovation in medical field

Innovation as a work concept more than be covered in one post but we going to highlight  main cores of the concept. Well developed innovation strategy of work would serve  by itself many sides rather than caring merely with modified different procedures. The amount of differences depending on certain contextual strategic framework reflect high will for real development and helping much in problem solutions finding journey. According to present statistics there are many opportunities enclose the contextual framework applications of innovation and that undoubtedly working on the same level with both traditional or modern working platforms.

West and Farr [1990] define organizational innovation as the intentional introduction and application (within a group or organization) of ideas, processes, products or procedures, new to the relevant unit of adoption, designed to significantly benefit the individual, the group, organization or wider society. There have been several attempts to classify innovation into categories.

Innovation is the implementation of a new or significantly improved product (good or service), or process, a new marketing method, or a new organizational method in business practices, workplace organization or external relations [UNESCO Institute for Statistics, 2005]. UNESCO makes the distinction among the four types of innovation as follows:

Product innovation: introduction of a good or service that is new or significantly improved with respect to its characteristics or intended uses. This includes significant improvements in technical specifications, components and materials, incorporated software, user friendliness or other functional characteristics.

Process innovation: implementation of a new or significantly improved production or delivery method. This includes significant changes in techniques, equipment and/or software. The customer does not usually pay directly for process, but the process is required to deliver a product or service and to manage the relationship with the various stakeholders.

Marketing innovation: implementation of a new marketing method involving significant changes in product design or packaging, product placement, product promotion or pricing.

Organizational innovation: implementation of a new organizational method in the firm’s business practices, workplace organization or external relations.

Innovations in health care are related to product, process, or structure [Varkey, et al., 2008]. The products or services what the customer paying for, thoroughly represent in medical domain the received end value or service idscussed formerly. Paid services here do not refer to medical service only from the pratical point but that exceeds to more innovative delivery infrastrutures and thus in many circumstances leading to create new business model and new operational techniques. These new model carry out direct effect on other stakholders forcing them getting new developed strategies falling ultimately in the patient side.

‘’Healthcare innovation can be defined as the introduction of a new concept, idea, service, process, or product aimed at improving treatment, diagnosis, education, outreach, prevention and research, and with the long term goals of improving quality, safety, outcomes, efficiency and costs.’’ Full health J

Innovation in healthcare delivery systems

Innovation in healthcare continues to be a driving force in the quest to balance cost containment and health care quality. Innovation is considered to be a critical component of business productivity and competitive survival [Zaltman, et al., 1973]. Product innovations are essential to the life of any organization since they provide the most obvious means for generating incremental revenues [Johne, 1999]. Similarly, process innovation is concerned with improving internal capabilities [Johne and Davies, 2000; Johne, 1999] and safeguarding and improving quality [Johne, 1999].

In 2005, industryweek.com did a study about the effects of innovation on a company and they found that, ―overall revenue growth (78%), customer satisfaction (76%), growth in revenue from new products or services (74%), increased productivity (71%), and earnings/profit margins (68%) were a result of the impact of innovation efforts. [Jusko, 2008].

In medical career, innovation represents major track for improvement, intentionally was or running in present. As known innovation importance could be never been split up from opportunities creation and investement vehicles drawing. Features characterized innovation in work little far from the process of invention while in many circumstances there are a line of demarcation between them in form of sponsorship linkage. Moreover; how far innovation as a working concept serves and support target steps in maximal threshold. Paperwork is prone to costly errors.

Sastry argues that huge savings can be realized by more and better use of electronic recordkeeping, employing software that can detect mistakes and issue prompts [Grose, 2008]. Innovation of medical procedure and process reflects dirctly high degree of flexibility and convenience among patients and end users.  Patients should be able to have immediate access to their own records and be able to transmit or carry it from one healthcare provider to another. Innovation has become a critical capability of all healthcare organizations [Lansisalmi, et al., 2006].

In addition, new digital information, nanotechnology, semiconductor products, and genetic engineering are revolutionizing health care, making old assumptions invalid and creating unanticipated prospects for innovation and improvement of existing processes [Govindarajan, 2007]. The last century has produced a proliferation of innovations in the health care industry aimed at enhancing life expectancy, quality of life, disgnostic and treatment options, as well as the efficiency and cost effectiveness of the healthcare system [Varkey, Horne and Bennet, 2006].

Definition of innovation in many categorize scale pertaining the procesdures, steps and delivery process of medical products. Numerous theories, opinions and vision descriping the innovation. The intentional introduction and application within a role, group, or organization, of ideas, processes, products or procedures, new to the relevant unit of adoption, designed to significantly benefit the individual, the group, or wider society‖ [West, 1990]. This definition is largely accepted among researchers in the field [Anderson, et al., 2004], captures the three most important characteristics of innovation: (a) novelty, (b) an application component and (c) an intended benefit [Lansisalmi, et al., 2006].

In line with this definition, innovation in healthcare organizations are typically new services, new ways of working and/or new technologies [Lansisalmi, et al., 2006]. From the patient’s point of view, the intended benefits are either improved health or reduced suffering due to illness [Faulkner and Kent, 2001]. The Advisory Committee on Measuring Innovation in the 21st Century Economy (2007) defines innovation as the design, invention, development and/or implementation of new or altered products, services, processes, systems, organizational structures, or business models for the purpose of creating new value for customers and financial returns for the firm.‖ [Varkey, et al., 2008]. Full healthJ

Healthcare’s digital future

Undoubtedly, future prediction of new medical technologies closely touching delivery process stay main target for most of professional health workers and innovators. In the past, medical systems suffered due to neglecting the process of innovation to create and draw new sufficient working one that could be flexible with modifications according to nature and sort of medical providers. Years after years, most population masses have appeared all over the world and put the authorities in front of burden to working directly on development and innovation merely on medical systems including delivery procedure and attributes necessary to overcome the recent technologies revolution. That considerably more activates many of firms to work and innovate new working systems service our present objects and matching with new demands of medical public care. Moreover; do properly needed modifications parallel to future development and expansion in order to adapt precisely working systems to the coming changes.

The areas of future developments and modifications are many and could not possible explained written. The coming diagram show summarized of branches for future development and modification.

http;//eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org

As you see, there are numerous branched working area need more effort than currently carried out, each of them owns their system implementation from professional and client sides. We should, all of us be more deep thinkers regarding these innovation and development to maximize future proceeds for generations

Digitalised form of delivery medical systems

IT adoption in medical systems are one of the most important evolvement have been carried out and ongoing with continuously level of development being covering different multiple operational systems. Previously the same systems are used to get suffering  with manual paper work especially with data retrival. Examination of patient history was really problem to know in precisely way. Moreover., the problem of data was not only related to the process of storage and retrival, definietly not; the problem exceed to the patient in form of medication history and diagnosis of past episodes. May be some opinions saying that all could be documented but what about space for storage, time and effort taken to organize and categorize them according to date or cases or even alphabets. It was almost impossible to do all in good acceptable way and of course during these endless processes of documentation, many data missed or lost by mistakes as a result of overwork or even carelessness sometimes.

The matter of system digitalization is seriously crucial for knowing the harmony among system, patients, workers and government, that could give us ability to understand the probabilities for future in good planning and awareness. What is not clear enough for reader; the process of digitalization is not restricted to the hospitals systems and primary care, that is far away from the real truth. The matter of digitalization including numerous stakeholders with domains.

The core of converting a system from traditional manual into digitalized one including many axial work patterns; and that to ensure viability of the system. In order to explain that would like first to explain briefly why many of system implementation trials been defeated although there were most  of enough work and associated accessories that could reach success. This simply happened because of devoid of digitalised infrastructures including devices, web, servers and how could be managed in big number and heavy data loading in different speed levels and more risky how would accommodate that with workers background and patients cultures.

In order to digitalizing the whole system with building firm infrastructure. First; we must see the picture about digital world clearly.

Digitalization of Clinics through generating health data with big data analytics, precision of medical records to keep the data storage and retrieval sound, full digitalization of clinic workflow with device integrations firmly contact with interoperability. Infrastructure devices; designning simplicity in work steps for health workers and patient at the same level, smart phone devices connections, wireless and wearable devices, lap-on-a-chip technologies, handheld working platform including images and lab in sito stations in which more useful in cases of emergency. The last phase to create digital patient;

Telemedicine, patient self measurements, patients generating data (PHR), digital retention and engagement to modify the old patient behavior to be more adaptable with modern digital technologies and this is the most intelligent actions to forcing the public into the key enforced actions be wanted to modify their behaviors into higher productivity in dealing with modern technologies apps. Full healthJ

Traditional healthcare system

In past, healthcare system carries some kind of attributes differ greatly than modern one. The working system refers to organization, operating delivery channels and workers responsibilities within medical organo-gram. Sort of working unites and components were related to delivery platforms that clearly determines the nature of system and end values demands. Moreover; each one of those is directly proportional with the society been working on. In other word; an unite of neonates should be accommodated with the needs and age segment objected for service and fully provided with all necessary equipments.

The construction of unites show the whole shape of system and how fit for purposes going to do. The deficits to delivery certain group of medical services at the same time to definitive number of people or patients considered remarkable system deviation from the correct way of modernization. Therefore; an old traditional  systems have struggled more with appearance of modernization , that create additional pressure to follow the new modern methodologies of delivery to receiver, in the time which most supported governments failed to operate the current system properly.

At a glance, being traditional health delivery vehicle own some setbacks does not mean, inferior helpless figures, absolutely not. Actually; most of running and past systems became more adaptable in their arena for years but less matching with modern digital systems. Also; can’t forget that the same systems throughout years had effective contributions in medical vehicle service provision, we politely show the defeats in order to achieve highest level of development and fast correction to serve more people segments and providing high quality working models.

The traditional old medical delivery threshold has many setbacks and prevailed among developing and undeveloped countries who not take medical domain as a business to create revenues and enhance the service quality in return supply less free ones. Moreover; traditional systems proved high effectiveness in high density societies and over populated states to over more people segment with fast growth rate, how?

In old systems,

Ø  Depending mainly on patient centralization model; means in linear link pattern between working system components regardless the role of data storage and case history. In this systems model the patient is the movable wheel for medical unites separately. In most cases; there is no financial out-pocket or firm insurance services and most of services got free depending on state support only with sure modest quality in serious cases.

Ø  As formerly mentioned, in normal diagnostic cases working well but in heavy funded operations; the state could not do perfect demanded coverage. As a result produce miserable stories because of severe shortages in service supply versus daily asks.

Ø  But still this system model; carries many benefits to workers without any mentioned responsibilities toward patient data models and archiving.

Ø  Modest revenues make the current and future opportunities for optimum development correction rare.

While in modern digitalized medical systems; there are different productive concept can create potential revenues used later in order to reach noticeable improvement and reinvestments. In next post we are going to talk in details about how far benefits could be got from use modern digitalize systems and that subsequently exaggerate the solutions and getting more closer to global standards of delivery systems. I wish you all healthJ