Fairness acclimatization suited to modern system modification

As we mentioned before that fairness is sophisticated academic term used for highly standards research and academic purposes in order to analyze certain segment of society and defined exactly the proper needs and demands of that segment depending on academic analysis hypotheses. But still not all healthcare system actually suitable to use this term and apply WHO parameters for measurements and that actually clearly explain why many countries suffered from gaps in healthcare fairness of contributions and reimbursement. Although from existence of normal medical care expenditures and moreover; in many of those countries with recent inflation and local currency purposely devaluation, found that government healthcare expenditures annually exceed logical norms. However; there are many indications referred by experiences to get noticed even with some of them over strictly implementation of fairness toward the end values.  It preferable to mention here that degree of household affordability with fairness parameter considered the key for assured implementation success. For instance; if we are talking from the perspective of households that should be ready to adapt their expenses and paying capacity to match the growing needs of care payments. The affordability differs even in the same society sector; it means high liquid income with inferior capacity would lead to ineffective current of expenditures whilst moderate income with intensified continuous expenditures will lead to and by practice to proper fairness contributions even on the benchmark of execution schedule. In order to be honest with you here that the point of affordability is more deep to discuss in one post and along years could not imposed and work with all society sectors with the same degree of responsiveness. Indeed, governments still face the same burden to acclimatize the level of affordability in order to reach the same benchmark or at least beginning of the standards for fairness parameters implementations.

If you could not solve the procedures of fairness parameters identification and other associated work concepts to fit in poor management to the point of affordability. Thence proper positive implementation of fairness parameters will not smoothly on the optimum. Evaluation of health expenditures of non-taxed government revenues with level of household subsistence revenues became more fit and work better to achieve equilibrium between care expenditures and future revenues.  Depending on the availability of various formal and informal mechanisms to borrow and save, households may behave as if they average their income over longer periods. In the extreme, the life cycle consumption hypothesis argues that households smooth consumption over the stream of all future income. (Ando A & Modigliani F 1963). As you see the point of synchronization and adjustment between income and expenditures carried long ago high significance to reach point of affordability and then would be more available to implement fairness parameters afterward.

Higher income will never solve the problem unless there is real monetary system depending on the actual values of the household purchases. From previous experiments along working healthcare system easily found high expensive health budget but among inflation mess there are millions could not afford and get fair values from the system and at the end the system going to be crashed as a result of poor funding management and continuous distress liquidity reasons plus sadly existence of humble medical care services and facilities.  Recently; there is a new trend to overcome all these burdens which prevent from attainment society affordability degree to get over first threshold of fairness hypothesis. we want here to remind that affordability is not only welfare to the community members than strong tool to keep the society in self-sufficiency level what going to save future prosperity to the next generations. Full health J