In this post we discuss
performance measures, health plans for hospitals and review some design consideration
tools and clues could be better for improvement. In order to study health systems,
terminology, analysis and performance measurement, could identify preliminary
objects and work future targets. In other meaning that why exactly we should study
and know within health system components and their performance and what are the
reasons pushing to spend months in process of analysis of work patterns and do
a lot of predictions supposed associated to get and find proper solutions.
First, it could be to identify the problems and setbacks that affect directly
or indirectly end value or results and interrupt the channel delivery process.
Secondly, doing the process of determination to different sort of working
performance and level of compatibility
between systems ability and degree of paid investment and performance
sufficiently to do delivery of end medical values.
No one can be sure from
system performances even with high technology standards were implemented in
certain system thereafter the process of assessments, monitoring and end
evaluation create some sort of performance thereof. Measuring performance in
not new technique to assess the whole work figure and tasks achieved, there are
many parameters, indicators prove and show the level of performance of any
working system whether that within medical domain or other industrial fields.
The number of measurements, nature of implementation, execution methods put
different mode of received results, in which declare the capability link
between systems and its performances.
There is no fixed result
in process of analysis, and well known NO
constant in medical sciences, depending on your working parameters,
directives, plans, working schedules and the possibilities would be determined
clearly. We are briefly going to review some historical glances related to
performance methodologies and explain how much greatly carries direct affect
plans of improvement, development and investment forwardly.
The history of
performance measurement started far back since the middle of 19th
Century; Ms. Florence Nightingale. She was concern about sanitary conditions of
hospitals in the Crimean War and in London. In that time; she was working to
develop elaborate data collections, statistical analysis with 1st
focusing on morbidity versus mortality rates and numbers. As a fact tools and
equipments were not much fit than our present but she intelligent enough to
start one step in long road of medical health informatics.
Dr. Amory
Codman, a Boston surgeon, extended these ideas in a crusade for public
reporting of hospital mortality data in the Boston area for a period of several
years between 1914 and 1920. He developed recoding system for his surgeries and
tracking patients improvements act as registry of morbidity and mortality
rates. He also categorize the patient complains regarding done operations and
whether that closely touched his work or produced from other associated medical
services. While that system did not be accepted from colleagues, he founded his
own hospital depending on end result concept.
In 1988, Dr.
Paul Ellwood issued a call for a national program named “Outcomes
Management.” his vision covered not only specific hospitals but exceed
other entities too in order to the heavily concept of provider accountability
toward patients and around society. His project been exceeded morbidity/
mortality ratio and working with health status, records and statistics of
patient value equation. Diversified resources and sorts carried out of medical
data including for instance; outcome records, clinical records, services
received, demographical distribution of available services with populations. This
diversity open bigger gate for research and information management concepts and
awareness impact, without past seeds were not the present contextual meaning of
data importance in medical careers. I wish all you health and happinessJ

No comments:
Post a Comment