Analysis Healthcare Tools

In our previous post, we were reviewing the main guidelines and steps might be used to implement analysis work toward healthcare system. Today we focusing on review in details some tools involved the process of analysis itself. We deal that there are a lot of work in order to reach the proper cause of system setbacks, although it seems that easy but practically time consuming than imagined. However with certain determined work steps could be taken in account try to do the whole process steps more convenient to processing team. The main features of analytical procedures actually undertake to catch the cause and categorize it and if that cause solitary or branched, means associated by other results or networks. Therefore; the sustainability and accountability necessary to reach appropriate real results.

There are many questions and data must be gathered to form Decision documents to prepare overview about which sides should get more investigations and precisely examined carefully, some of these questions as follow:

What kind of technology is used?

What kind of supervision and maintenance policies?

What are main rules of performance?

What kind of work objectives and aimed targets?

What are associated boosting tasks and networks?

What is work environment and if that matching with standards?

Building decision document gives significant impact on the success of analysis also, to prepare guidelines for future fast correction pattern serves the end results. The number of decision building documents varies according systems sort and tasks related, it might be few pages or hundreds of pages. Actually the pages itself play a role to get good reliable effect correction to appeared setbacks through providing real reliable data with further future decisions about working steps and possibilities of weakness later. 

What more interesting in this point, that even with some sound network sites, should not be far from examination to be proved or neglected in the fixation operation. In many cases, network seems sound but that soundness leading somehow to aside errors in next steps, depending degree of professionalism of analysis and method been used, so the kind used in healthcare system analysis and what better than others and what is the best for all?

To Err Is Human8 & Crossing the Quality Chasm, they are medicine institutes reported that human factor methods could addressed to serve patient safety and quality of care issues. Since these reports issued, many of human related methods modified in their work prospect to adapt mainly patient needs and demands. To conduct analysis in healthcare domain, there are many of usable methods available; but few widely used and experienced more,

1. Macro-ergonomics analysis & design (MEAD)

2. Fault Tree analysis. (FTA)

3. Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA)

4. Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA)

Each of them used effectively to determine the system weakness and deteriorations and retardations. What really want to mention here; that sort of system used in the process of analysis is not core for end results but how to implement is the backbone of analysis success. These methods are considered just beginning of improvement requirement threshold, that might lead us to more deeply high productive ways of analysis and system data management. However; as well known optimism always; start with minimum and all of us hope more and more in future to serve our patient with great kind professional way. Wish all you health & happiness:) 

 References:

Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. To err

is human: building a safer health system. A report of

the Committee on Quality of Health Care in America,

Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National

Academy Press; 2000.

Hurtado MP, Swift EK, Corrigan JM, editors.

Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for

the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy

Press; 2001.

Hendrik HW, Kleiner BM. Macroergonomics: and

introduction to work system design. Santa Monica,

CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2000.

Pasmore W. Designing effective organizations: the

sociotechnical systems perspective. New York, NY:

John Wiley and Sons; 1988.