Forms of health policy conflicts

Previously, we were talking about policy main points briefly, and also framework identity for EU working policies, today we show different face of coin and how it affects the working objects. Actually there is a problem from using any of policy achieve society and public object unless service the state goals for welfare and improvement. But would be near to optimum if this policy going to attain the targets and also does not make conflicts with society individuals, but still there point was always been neglected for long; how we can adapt the theoretical working policy to match more our needs and demands regardless tough theoretical rules and do more matching with future development plan. The distance between the policy and objects is not far and in many situations the key of policy implementation laid in level of flexibility between them. The importance resulted from be aware of policy implementation and associated procedures till end received values are drawing main picture about how integrity should be involved with policy embedded with innovative ideas.

There are many forms of policy conflicts depending on working procedures, end results, implementation plan and eventually social impact on community.

Modality conflicts: how the implementation of any policy is crucial for execution. However roadmaps are most important practically. As well known before never got gold by planning for gold, actions and moving is more significant ever, planning and road map should not exceed thirty percent from any strategy procedure framework. Precisely; as simple effective your working model is as more achievable end results might ne got with high degree of satisfaction from community and individuals.

Road map (procedures) conflicts: after drawing the main goals or targets related to the state policy should be more fragmented according to society available tools and facilities and governors should bear in mind the flexible strategic substitutional pathways for coming risks and obstacles. Road map is considered the action plan would show setbacks, strong sides, weakness points and useful tool for auditing and forward checking up.

End achievable conflicts: clearly; many governments spent billions of Dollars for poor end result strategies and what is really worth; they fighting for its existence with public particularly. Meanwhile; admitting with mistakes officially is not declared anyhow. Community is more sensitive for any change and easier to lead via old believes than new ones but if that happened with improper way or in unsuitable site, going to cost the society a lot. Examples for that are numerous, clearly appeared around everyday related to political and economical issues prove the gap between policy makers and aimed receivers.

Systems are created to make people more organized and prepared and carry in between many advantages to improve our life and societies, but exceeding normal limits putting new heavy barriers for public and society moreover; a way of implementing that kind systems and strategies reflect the caring attitude of the state toward community and individuals. Privately, I found always people who create societies not systems, it means without real community acceptance there is no improvement or implementation could be succeeded. Right now there is question aroused; is it the correct way for improvement and development or we need more innovative modified methodology adaptable more our new lifestyle?! J